Are Motorcycles Safer Than Cars Reddit

Posted on

Are Motorcycles Safer Than Cars Reddit – I bet it doesn’t take five minutes for motorcycles to come up in a conversation between me and a stranger. As many readers here may know firsthand, after discovering that I am a motorcycle enthusiast, I am often met with comments such as “I don’t think I can ride a motorcycle forever; with everyone texting and driving, drivers are more distracted and motorcycles are already dangerous”. I won’t discount the fact that many drivers are not careful on the road, and while motorcycles are more challenging than cars, I don’t think budding riders should sell themselves short. , motorcycles may not be as dangerous as you think.

Someone right now just read that last sentence and said “What do you mean they’re not dangerous!?!!?” followed by “statistics show that you are 30% more likely to die riding a motorcycle than riding a car”. Statistics are a fun thing to discuss, and discussion can be worthwhile, as long as you understand what conclusions can be drawn from statistics, and what remains uncertain. Let’s talk about some (United States) 2013 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Statistics shall we?

Are Motorcycles Safer Than Cars Reddit

Are Motorcycles Safer Than Cars Reddit

Based on these statistics it seems pretty clear that if you don’t have a license you will be killed riding a motorcycle…

Motorcycle Safety Advocate Warns Manitobans To Be Alert As Warm Weather Extends Season

I think it’s obvious that the numbers above have led people to less than accurate conclusions. Based on miles traveled and the percentage of “highway” deaths totaled, it is true that motorcycles make up the majority of deaths, but the points are ignored by simple numbers and other uncollected data. I understand the objective basis for comparing motorcycles to cars based on average mileage, but I think that ignores the fact that motorcycles in the United States are generally considered toys. A large portion of the US population commutes to work every day by car (about 10,000 miles a year for me, to work), and some cyclists only get a bike on Sundays, and only when it’s sunny and 70. My point is that statistics ignore the individual characteristics of the rider a motorcycle, and a literally kills with a motorcycle (the same goes for cars honestly). Statistics also show that drugs, alcohol, and other dangerous behaviors contribute to motorcycle deaths (similar injury rates); Dare I suggest that these people behave the same way in cars, but survive accidents? At the same time, would it be reasonable to believe that motorcyclists are affected by people who do not care about their safety and do not pay attention to statistics? Many people, including many motorcyclists, focus on other vehicles as a major risk, but most accidents do not involve any other vehicles, just a bicycle – motor. That’s the kind of subtle irony that most people don’t see, while traffic and conditions play a role in fatalities, often the skill or choice of the rider has a bigger impact. Ultimately I don’t see how a motorcycle, with such a small sample size, can be judged accurately, numerically, against such a large group of riders.

In addition to my odd observations, and what the statistics say, there is clearly a lack of information. NHTSA’s statistics do not (exactly) describe which passengers wear helmets, wear safety gear, and receive passenger safety training. Statistics talk about day and night (and the coincidental connection to alcoholism…), but they don’t explain the weather. I would like to know how many fatal accidents occur on the water, and the average time of the year; what are the accident times in january? I think summer time is the “deadliest” time for motorcyclists, I’m sure there are more bikes on the road, but how does it affect survival? Since most cyclists are unaffected by the rain, I suspect the statistics will show that most accidents happen on sunny days (or drunken nights…); if so, does that mean that skilled pilots flying in bad weather are not well represented in statistical data? I also wonder how many motorcyclist deaths are due to motorcycle accidents, or “chain reaction” accidents where several bikes blast off a curve following the lead bike, all riding too fast. Like cyclists who despise “cages”, I think many riders don’t understand the dangers of group riding. Motorcycle groups are more visible to drivers, but I find that many riders start riding in groups before they are really ready, and find themselves struggling with the mentality of “I have to catch up”, or “only. a few beers. “, worse. Since my car insurance has decreased after 25 years of age, I have to think that knowledge and experience tend to prevent accidents with age. Naturally there are no statistics that can only tell us the average miles traveled by each motorcycle (I think it is correct), but statistics do not tell us how many motorcycles a particular rider has, or how many miles the rider puts on the bike each year.” Although American motorcyclists generally do not ride enough, I suspect there is a Correlation between annual mileage and (relative) rider safety. They say “with age comes knowledge” (and wisdom) but that may be wrong about motorcycles as most deaths occur in the 40 and over age group, but I think there is a generational cause for that; and, it cannot explain those statistics.

Statistics are one thing, but most people don’t realize that being a motorcyclist changes the way you cross the roads. It doesn’t mean, I’ll ride ten minutes out of my way if it means avoiding traffic lights or getting an extra ride. I feel that many cyclists “take the back road” too often when riding; my uncle used to say “with a motorcycle, everything is on the road.” Now, taking the back road is a double-edged sword, and on the back road you’re likely to increase the number of cars you’re competing against. Unlike the freeway, where we all travel the same route, the back roads have more traffic, more road debris, and hidden entrances. I don’t think people understand how mentally challenging it is to ride a motorcycle. I suspect that many people are tired when they get in the car (maybe it’s just me?); I can only imagine the same is true of studios, DVD players and cell phones used while driving. On a motorcycle I am more focused on what is happening around me, time passes very quickly, and I don’t feel distracted by the normal work of going to work (another reason why I avoid the highway, it takes care of all concerned) . Beyond the feeling of the road running past your feet, many motorcyclists I have spoken to talk about a heightened awareness or “being in the place”. I don’t think that motorcycles have real power (or do they?…), but just that motorcycles in terms of work are almost completely involved in the track, the feeling of the engine, the road, the smell of burning brakes coming. outside. from that car just before, and so on. In general, I believe that this focus on survival leads many cyclists to notice small changes in the behavior of cars, to notice that the pattern changes later, looking chan not only in the car in front of them, but in both cars in front of that one. Of course not all passenger experiences are the same, but I suspect NHTSA may want to look at all passenger habits, not just the dead and injured. By the same token, I also suspect that an increasing number of riders are getting their endorsement through the Basic Rider Course (BRC) compared to taking the old school BMV test. Meanwhile, I also suspect that more and more drivers are doing the opposite, especially since I paid $200 to learn to drive in 1999, but today there is only a BRC in Ohio for $50. In twenty years it will be interesting to see if the accident statistics have anything to do with training, and the lack of it.

Despite my earlier points, I suspect that new would-be riders will be misinformed about the dangers of motorcycles, given the lack of protection. Although it is true that motorcycles are exposed to the elements (and maybe the pavement…), the “anti-motorcycle” may reduce the ability to move and the power of the bike-motor weight. While cars must brake and slide into an object, motorcycles may have the option to swerve or split lanes to avoid a crash. At the same time, motorcycles have the ability to accelerate away from danger in a way that few cars can; It may be more logical, but I suspect that sharp riders have significant advantages over cars in most cases. Despite the lack of protection, I suspect some will say that if the weather is bad, two wheels are not equal to four. Again, I don’t completely agree, but it’s a modern motorcycle

Retrospective: 1990 2002 Honda St1100

Are trucks safer than cars, are planes safer than cars, why motorcycles are safer than cars, are motorcycles safer than cars, are trikes safer than motorcycles, are crossovers safer than cars, are mopeds safer than motorcycles, are bioidentical hormones safer than synthetic, are bikes safer than cars, are airplanes safer than cars, are scooters safer than motorcycles, are suvs safer than cars